Get Started for FREE
Sign up with Facebook Sign up with X
I don't have a Facebook or a X account
 Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scoop.it!
People really can’t learn well without relationships. Sure, they can process information and take standardized tests, but a mind by itself can only answer its own questions and is rarely, if ever, inspired. 
No comment yet.
Sign up to comment
Scoop.it!
Nearly 1,600 Jaspersoft Community Members Participate in Second Jaspersoft Big Data Survey - San Francisco, February 4, 2014 - Jaspersoft, the Intelligence Inside applications and business.... Via Peter Azzopardi
|
Scoop.it!
"Learning analytics stand poised to benefit students in previously impossible ways. Alongside innovation, however, ethical discussions need probing questions, assessments of possible outcomes, and active disagreement about future developments. Ethical modeling will not achieve these, at least not in a substantive way; principled reflection needs to keep up with the speed of innovation as closely as possible. An inner matrix of tensions will achieve ethical reflection aligned with innovation — or at least get us closer to that goal. When schools or companies build new learning analytics systems, or when schools are deciding between competing products, ethical discussions ought to be in the forefront of outcomes-based commitments. The proposed tensions of utopianism (what is the very best outcome?), ambiguity (are the outcomes knowable?), and nihilism (how are unexpected outcomes handled?) can help institutions and companies fulfill the goal of assisting student success." Via Society for College and University Planning (SCUP)
Society for College and University Planning (SCUP)'s curator insight,
September 9, 2014 8:57 AM
The author, James E. Willis, III is an educational assessment specialist at Purdue University. |
