Immunology and Biotherapies
37.9K views | +0 today
Follow
Immunology and Biotherapies
Page Ressources et Actualités du DIU immunologie et biothérapies
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Rescooped by Gilbert C FAURE from Cancer Vaccines Collection
Scoop.it!

The Next Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors: PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade in Melanoma

Findings

The anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 agents have been reported to have impressive antitumor effects in several malignancies, including melanoma. The greatest clinical activity in unselected patients has been seen in melanoma. Tumor expression of PD-L1 is a suggestive, but inadequate, biomarker predictive of response to immune-checkpoint blockade. However, tumors expressing little or no PD-L1 are less likely to respond to PD-1 pathway blockade. Combination checkpoint blockade with PD-1 plus cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen (CTLA)-4 blockade appears to improve response rates in patients who are less likely to respond to single-checkpoint blockade. Toxicity with PD-1 blocking agents is less than the toxicity with previous immunotherapies (eg, interleukin 2, CTLA-4 blockade). Certain adverse events can be severe and potentially life threatening, but most can be prevented or reversed with close monitoring and appropriate management.

Implications

This family of immune-checkpoint inhibitors benefits not only patients with metastatic melanoma but also those with historically less responsive tumor types. Although a subset of patients responds to single-agent blockade, the initial trial of checkpoint-inhibitor combinations has reported a potential to improve response rates. Combination therapies appear to be a means of increasing response rates, albeit with increased immune-related adverse events. As these treatments become available to patients, education regarding the recognition and management of immune-related effects of immune-checkpoint blockade will be essential for maximizing clinical benefit.


Via Krishan Maggon
Krishan Maggon 's curator insight, May 15, 2015 4:02 AM

doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.02.018

 

Clinical Therapeutics

Volume 37, Issue 4, 1 April 2015, Pages 764–782

Review Article The Next Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors: PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade in MelanomaKathleen M. Mahoney, MD, PhD1, 2, , , Gordon J. Freeman, PhD2, David F. McDermott, MD1

Rescooped by Gilbert C FAURE from Cancer Immunotherapy Review and Collection
Scoop.it!

Therapeutic uses of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies

Therapeutic uses of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies | Immunology and Biotherapies | Scoop.it

Abstract

 

In recent years, immune checkpoints that maintain physiologic self-tolerance have been implicated in the down-regulation of anti-tumor immunity. Efforts to restore latent anti-tumor immunity have focused on antibody-based interventions targeting CTL antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) on T lymphocytes and its principal ligand (PD-L1) on tumor cells. Ipilimumab, an antibody targeting CTLA-4, appears to restore tumor immunity at the priming phase, whereas anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies restore immune function in the tumor microenvironment. Although ipilimumab can produce durable long-term responses in patients with advanced melanoma, it is associated with significant immune-related toxicities. By contrast, antibodies targeting either PD-1 or PD-L1 have produced significant anti-tumor activity with considerably less toxicity. Activity was seen in patients with melanoma and renal cancer, as well as those with non-small-cell lung, bladder and head and neck cancers, tumors not previously felt to be sensitive to immunotherapy. The tolerability of PD-1-pathway blockers and their unique mechanism of action have made them ideal backbones for combination regimen development. Combination approaches involving cytotoxic chemotherapy, anti-angiogenic agents, alternative immune-checkpoint inhibitors, immunostimulatory cytokines and cancer vaccines are currently under clinical investigation. Current efforts focus on registration trials of single agents and combinations in various diseases and disease settings and identifying predictive biomarkers of response.


Via Krishan Maggon
Krishan Maggon 's curator insight, March 3, 2015 12:18 PM
George K. Philips and Michael AtkinsTherapeutic uses of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies

Int. Immunol. (2015) 27 (1): 39-46 doi:10.1093/intimm/dxu095

Rescooped by Gilbert C FAURE from Cancer Immunotherapy Review and Collection
Scoop.it!

Merck Receives Accelerated Approval of KEYTRUDA® (pembrolizumab), the First FDA-Approved Anti-PD-1 Therapy

Merck Receives Accelerated Approval of KEYTRUDA® (pembrolizumab), the First FDA-Approved Anti-PD-1 Therapy | Immunology and Biotherapies | Scoop.it
WHITEHOUSE STATION, N.J.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Merck (NYSE:MRK), known as MSD outside the United States and Canada, today announced that the U.S. 

Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved KEYTRUDA® (pembrolizumab) at a dose of 2 mg/kg every three weeks for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma and disease progression following ipilimumab and, if BRAF V600 mutation positive, a BRAF inhibitor. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on tumor response rate and durability of response. An improvement in survival or disease-related symptoms has not yet been established. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials.

KEYTRUDA is the first anti-PD-1 (programmed death receptor-1) therapy approved in the United States and received FDA’s Breakthrough Therapy designation for advanced melanoma, which was granted based on the significance of early study findings and the unmet medical need. For the recommended 2 mg/kg dose based on data in 89 patients, the overall response rate was 24 percent (95% CI: 15, 34), with one complete response and 20 partial responses (21/89). At the time of analysis, 86 percent (18/21) of patients with objective responses had ongoing responses with durations ranging from 1.4+ to 8.5+ months, including eight patients with ongoing responses of 6 months or longer. Fourteen percent (3/21) had progression of disease 2.8, 2.9, and 8.2 months after initial response.

 

KEYTRUDA is a humanized monoclonal antibody that works by increasing the ability of the body’s immune system to fight advanced melanoma. KEYTRUDA blocks the interaction between PD-1 and its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, and may affect both tumor cells and healthy cells. Immune-mediated adverse reactions occurred with KEYTRUDA including pneumonitis, colitis, hepatitis, hypophysitis, nephritis, hyperthyroidism, and hypothyroidism. Based on the severity of the adverse reaction, KEYTRUDA should be withheld or discontinued and corticosteroids administered. Based on its mechanism of action, KEYTRUDA may cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Female patients of reproductive potential should be advised of the potential hazard to a fetus. For more information regarding immune-mediated adverse reactions and use in pregnancy, see “Selected Important Safety Information” below.

 

Merck is conducting ongoing Phase 2 and 3 clinical studies in advanced melanoma, which are designed to provide further confirmatory evidence for KEYTRUDA in this indication. Merck plans to make KEYTRUDA available within one week from today’s FDA approval.

 

Study Cohort Supporting the Accelerated FDA Approval of Single-Agent KEYTRUDA

The approval of KEYTRUDA was based on data from a multi-center, open-label, randomized, dose-comparative study cohort of the ongoing KEYNOTE-001 Phase 1b trial in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma and progression of disease. Key eligibility criteria included prior treatment with ipilimumab (two or more doses at 3 mg/kg or higher) and a BRAF or MEK inhibitor, if BRAF V600 mutation positive; and disease progression within 24 weeks following the last dose of ipilimumab. Patients were randomized to receive 2 mg/kg (n=89) or 10 mg/kg (n=84) of KEYTRUDA every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. The major efficacy outcome measures were confirmed overall response rate as assessed by blinded independent central review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) and duration of response. Tumor response was assessed every 12 weeks.

Selected Important Safety Information for KEYTRUDA

Pneumonitis occurred in 12 (2.9%) of 411 patients, including Grade 2 or 3 cases in 8 (1.9%) and 1 (0.2%) patients respectively, receiving KEYTRUDA. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of pneumonitis. Evaluate suspected pneumonitis with radiographic imaging. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater pneumonitis. Withhold KEYTRUDA for Grade 2; permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA for Grade 3 or 4 pneumonitis.

Colitis (including microscopic colitis) occurred in 4 (1%) of 411 patients, including Grade 2 or 3 cases in 1 (0.2%) and 2 (0.5%) patients respectively, receiving KEYTRUDA. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of colitis. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater colitis. Withhold KEYTRUDA for Grade 2 or 3; permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA for Grade 4 colitis.

Hepatitis (including autoimmune hepatitis) occurred in 2 (0.5%) of 411 patients, including a Grade 4 case in 1 (0.2%) patient, receiving KEYTRUDA. Monitor patients for changes in liver function. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater hepatitis and, based on severity of liver enzyme elevations, withhold or discontinue KEYTRUDA.

Hypophysitis occurred in 2 (0.5%) of 411 patients, including a Grade 2 case in 1 and a Grade 4 case in 1 (0.2% each) patient, receiving KEYTRUDA. Monitor for signs and symptoms of hypophysitis. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater hypophysitis. Withhold KEYTRUDA for Grade 2; withhold or discontinue for Grade 3; and permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA for Grade 4 hypophysitis.

Nephritis occurred in 3 (0.7%) patients receiving KEYTRUDA, consisting of one case of Grade 2 autoimmune nephritis (0.2%) and two cases of interstitial nephritis with renal failure (0.5%), one Grade 3 and one Grade 4. Monitor patients for changes in renal function. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater nephritis. Withhold KEYTRUDA for Grade 2; permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA for Grade 3 or 4 nephritis.

Hyperthyroidism occurred in 5 (1.2%) of 411 patients, including Grade 2 or 3 cases in 2 (0.5%) and 1 (0.2%) patients respectively, receiving KEYTRUDA. Hypothyroidism occurred in 34 (8.3%) of 411 patients, including a Grade 3 case in 1 (0.2%) patient, receiving KEYTRUDA. Thyroid disorders can occur at any time during treatment. Monitor patients for changes in thyroid function (at the start of treatment, periodically during treatment, and as indicated based on clinical evaluation) and for clinical signs and symptoms of thyroid disorders. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 3 or greater hyperthyroidism. Withhold KEYTRUDA for Grade 3; permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA for Grade 4 hyperthyroidism. Isolated hypothyroidism may be managed with replacement therapy without treatment interruption and without corticosteroids.

The following clinically significant, immune-mediated adverse reactions occurred in less than 1% of patients treated with KEYTRUDA: exfoliative dermatitis, uveitis, arthritis, myositis, pancreatitis, hemolytic anemia, partial seizures arising in a patient with inflammatory foci in brain parenchyma, adrenal insufficiency, myasthenic syndrome, optic neuritis, and rhabdomyolysis.

Based on its mechanism of action, KEYTRUDA may cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. If used during pregnancy, or if the patient becomes pregnant during treatment, apprise the patient of potential hazard to a fetus. Advise females of reproductive potential to use highly effective contraception during treatment and for 4 months after the last dose of KEYTRUDA.

KEYTRUDA was discontinued for adverse reactions in 6% of 89 patients who received the recommended dose of 2 mg/kg and 9% of 411 patients across all doses studied. Serious adverse reactions occurred in 36% of patients receiving KEYTRUDA. The most frequent serious adverse drug reactions reported in 2% or more of patients were renal failure, dyspnea, pneumonia, and cellulitis.

The most common adverse reactions (reported in ≥20% of patients) were fatigue (47%), cough (30%), nausea (30%), pruritus (30%), rash (29%), decreased appetite (26%), constipation (21%), arthralgia (20%), and diarrhea (20%).

The recommended dose of KEYTRUDA is 2 mg/kg administered as an intravenous infusion over 30 minutes every three weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. No formal pharmacokinetic drug interaction studies have been conducted with KEYTRUDA.

It is not known whether KEYTRUDA is excreted in human milk. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk, instruct women to discontinue nursing during treatment with KEYTRUDA. Safety and effectiveness of KEYTRUDA have not been established in pediatric patients.

Commitment to Access for KEYTRUDA

Merck is committed to making KEYTRUDA accessible to patients. Reimbursement support for eligible patients receiving KEYTRUDA, including help with out-of-pocket costs and co-pay assistance, is available through The Merck Access Program. For eligible patients who are uninsured, financial assistance is available through Merck’s patient assistance program. More information is available by calling 1-855-257-3932 or visiting www.merckaccessprogram-keytruda.com.

About KEYTRUDA

KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks the interaction between PD-1 and its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2. By binding to the PD-1 receptor and blocking the interaction with the receptor ligands, KEYTRUDA releases the PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response, including the anti-tumor immune response.


Via Krishan Maggon
Gilbert C FAURE's insight:

so fast!

Krishan Maggon 's curator insight, September 4, 2014 5:30 PM

Merck has taken a few months advance over Immunotherapy pioneer and current leader BMS as FDA/EMA approval is expected for Opdivo (Nivolumab) is expected by the end of 2014.

 

The price of Keytruda may be in the $150.000-300000 per year/patient treatment.

 

There  are 6 approved drugs to treat melanoma

 

The five prior FDA approvals for melanoma include:

 

Immunotherapy

 

ipilimumab (2011)  CTLA4 inhibitor     BMS   Yervoy

Pembrolizumab (2014)  PD1 inhibitor  Merck  Keytruda

 

cytokine

 

peginterferon alfa-2b (2011)  Bayer  Sylatron

 

BRAF inhibitors

 

vemurafenib (2011)  Roche  Zelboraf

 

dabrafenib (2013)     GSK    Tafinlar

 

Protein Kinase Inhibitor

 

trametinib (2013)  GSK    Mekinist

Krishan Maggon 's curator insight, September 4, 2014 7:14 PM

Merck has taken a few months advance over Immunotherapy pioneer and current leader BMS as FDA/EMA approval is expected for Opdivo (Nivolumab) is expected by the end of 2014.

 

The price of Keytruda may be in the $150.000-300000 per year/patient treatment.

 

There  are 6 approved drugs to treat melanoma

 

The five prior FDA approvals for melanoma include:

 

Immunotherapy

 

ipilimumab (2011)  CTLA4 inhibitor     BMS   Yervoy

Pembrolizumab (2014)  PD1 inhibitor  Merck  Keytruda

 

cytokine

 

peginterferon alfa-2b (2011)  Bayer  Sylatron

 

BRAF inhibitors

 

vemurafenib (2011)  Roche  Zelboraf

 

dabrafenib (2013)     GSK    Tafinlar

 

Protein Kinase Inhibitor

 

trametinib (2013)  GSK    Mekinist

Rescooped by Gilbert C FAURE from Cancer Vaccines Collection
Scoop.it!

Clinical deployment of antibodies for treatment of melanoma

Abstract

The concept of using immunotherapy to treat melanoma has existed for decades. The rationale comes from the knowledge that many patients with melanoma have endogenous immune responses against their tumor cells and clinically meaningful tumor regression can be achieved in a minority of patients using cytokines such as interleukin-2 and adoptive cellular therapy. In the last 5 years there has been a revolution in the clinical management of melanoma in large measure based on the development of antibodies that influence T cell regulatory pathways by overcoming checkpoint inhibition and providing co-stimulation, either of which results in significantly more effective immune-mediated tumor destruction. This review will describe the pre-clinical and clinical application of antagonistic antibodies targeting the T-cell checkpoints cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death 1 (PD-1), and agonistic antibodies targeting the costimulatory pathways OX40 and 4-1BB. Recent progress and opportunities for future investigation of combination antibody therapy will be described.


Via Krishan Maggon
Krishan Maggon 's curator insight, March 9, 2015 3:56 AM

Highlights

 

Melanoma treatment has been transformed using T-cell checkpoint antibodies.

Antibodies to CTLA-4 and PD-1 have had the largest impact on melanoma management.

Combination T-cell checkpoint therapy holds great promise for clinical development.

OX40 and 4-1BB are T cell costimulators with clinical potential in melanoma.

 

 

Rescooped by Gilbert C FAURE from Cancer Immunotherapy Review and Collection
Scoop.it!

Therapeutic uses of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies

Therapeutic uses of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies | Immunology and Biotherapies | Scoop.it
Therapeutic uses of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies http://t.co/4XGxIKdg1U #immunotherapy #lungcancer #awareness #LCAM @OxfordJournals

 

Abstract

Despite extensive investigation over the past three decades, cancer immunotherapy has produced limited success, with few agents achieving approval by the Food and Drug Administration and even the most effective helping only a minority of patients, primarily with melanoma or renal cancer. In recent years, immune checkpoints that maintain physiologic self-tolerance have been implicated in the down-regulation of anti-tumor immunity. Efforts to restore latent anti-tumor immunity have focused on antibody-based interventions targeting CTL antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) on T lymphocytes and its principal ligand (PD-L1) on tumor cells. Ipilimumab, an antibody targeting CTLA-4, appears to restore tumor immunity at the priming phase, whereas anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies restore immune function in the tumor microenvironment. Although ipilimumab can produce durable long-term responses in patients with advanced melanoma, it is associated with significant immune-related toxicities. By contrast, antibodies targeting either PD-1 or PD-L1 have produced significant anti-tumor activity with considerably less toxicity. Activity was seen in patients with melanoma and renal cancer, as well as those with non-small-cell lung, bladder and head and neck cancers, tumors not previously felt to be sensitive to immunotherapy. The tolerability of PD-1-pathway blockers and their unique mechanism of action have made them ideal backbones for combination regimen development. Combination approaches involving cytotoxic chemotherapy, anti-angiogenic agents, alternative immune-checkpoint inhibitors, immunostimulatory cytokines and cancer vaccines are currently under clinical investigation. Current efforts focus on registration trials of single agents and combinations in various diseases and disease settings and identifying predictive biomarkers of response.

Therapeutic uses of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodiesTable 1.

Antibodies that target the PD-1 axis and are undergoing clinical investigation for cancer

 TargetAntibodyMolecular structureClinical development phaseTumor types in evaluationPD-1Nivolumab (BMS-936558)Fully human IgG4Phase IIIMelanoma, RCC, NSCLC, HNSCCPembrolizumab (MK-3475)Humanized IgG4Phase IIIMelanoma, NSCLCPidilizumab (CT-011)Humanized IgG1κPhase IIHEME, melanomaPD-L1BMS-936559Fully human IgG4Phase IAdvanced solid tumorsMPDL3280AFully human IgG1Phase IMelanoma, RCC, NSCLCPhase IIUROMEDI4736Fully human IgG1Phase IAdvanced solid tumorsPhase IIINSCLCMSB0010718CFully human IgG1Phase IAdvanced solid tumorsPhase IIMerkel cell carcinoma
Via Krishan Maggon
Krishan Maggon 's curator insight, November 15, 2014 1:38 AM

Review of the current status of active PD1/PDL1 projects                    

 

 

Int. Immunol. (2014)doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxu095                                     First published online: October 16, 2014

 

Therapeutic uses of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodiesGeorge K. Philips1 and Michael Atkins2

+Author Affiliations

1 Department of Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Road NW, Washington DC 20007, USA2 Department of Oncology, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Research Building-E501, 3970 Reservoir Road NW, Washington DC 20057, USACorrespondence to: G. K. Philips; E-mail: george.k.philips@gunet.georgetown.eduReceived September 4, 2014.Accepted October 3, 2014.
Krishan Maggon 's curator insight, November 15, 2014 2:06 AM

Review of the current status of active PD1/PDL1 projects                    

 

 

Int. Immunol. (2014)doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxu095                                     First published online: October 16, 2014

 

Therapeutic uses of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodiesGeorge K. Philips1 and Michael Atkins2

+Author Affiliations

1 Department of Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Road NW, Washington DC 20007, USA2 Department of Oncology, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Research Building-E501, 3970 Reservoir Road NW, Washington DC 20057, USACorrespondence to: G. K. Philips; E-mail: george.k.philips@gunet.georgetown.eduReceived September 4, 2014.Accepted October 3, 2014.