Get Started for FREE
Sign up with Facebook Sign up with X
I don't have a Facebook or a X account
 Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scoop.it!
France has banned commercial applications of brain imaging. So why approve its use in court, asks Olivier Oullier. Articles about NEUROSCIENCE: http://www.scoop.it/t/science-news?page=1&tag=neuroscience 
No comment yet.
Sign up to comment
Scoop.it!
Neuroscience offers the prospect of an incontrovertible record of the intentions behind everything we do, so jury trials may eventually be deemed unnecessary. But no chip implanted? Guilty as charged!
No implant? No job offers, no entry to premises, including shops and (gated) streets. No insurance, no rights, no identity. Not enough memory in a chip to store all those endless petabytes of neuroscan data? No problem, our brains and their motivational states will always be online, at CerebroStreamTube Live! We can even share our mental condition on psychosocial media such as CortexBook™ or our free-floating anxieties can be nanoblogged in real-time, once every 140 semantic samples, on Twititititer™.
|
Scoop.it!
How should insights about the brain affect the course of a criminal trial, from the arguments in a courtroom to the issuing of a sentence?
|
