Virus World

People between 18 and 55 had adverse events thought to be related to the vaccine 16.7% of the time, and none was reported in older recipients. Pfizer and BioNTech surprised many industry watchers on July 27 when they announced they would conduct a large-scale study of a vaccine for Covid-19. The surprise? The vaccine that would be tested in a 30,000-patient trial wasn’t the one for which the companies had presented data on July 1. The reason, the companies said, was that a second vaccine seemed to generate a similar immune response, but fewer side effects. On Thursday, they posted the results from all 332 people who received either vaccine, referred to as vaccines B1 or B2 — and indeed, B2 recipients experienced markedly fewer adverse events tied to the vaccine. The study tested doses of each vaccine ranging from 10 micrograms to 100 micrograms. The 30-microgram dose of B2 is being taken forward in clinical trials.

With the original vaccine, called BNT162b1, or B1 for short, patients between the ages of 18 and 55 had adverse events thought to be related to the vaccine 50% of the time at the 30-microgram dose. Those between the ages of 65 and 85 had related adverse events 16.7% of the time. For the second vaccine, BNT162b2, or B2, patients between 18 and 55 had adverse events thought to be related to the vaccine 16.7% of the time, and no adverse effects thought to be related to the vaccine were reported in those between the ages of 65 and 85. Both vaccines use mRNA — the genetic messenger the body uses to make the DNA code into proteins — packaged inside a fatty capsule, called a lipid nanoparticle, that allows it to get into cells. The mRNA instructs cells to make a protein, which then triggers the immune system into action. For the B1 vaccine, the mRNA coded for the part of a protein on the SARS-CoV-2 virus that binds to a receptor on human cells in order to gain entry to them. The B2 vaccine makes the entirety of this protein, known as the spike protein.

Using the full spike protein may allow the immune system to figure out more ways to detect and attack the virus. Chemical modifications to the mRNA may also explain some of the difference. Although the same dosage, by weight, was given to patients with each vaccine, the B2 vaccine would include fewer particles, because the full-length mRNA is heavier. The side effects tracked were mostly those one would expect from a vaccine injection, including soreness at the injection site, fever, chills, headache, and muscle or joint pain. No older adult who received B2 reported redness or swelling at the injection site. The average level of antibodies to the virus in older adults was only 41% that seen in younger participants. However, it was still higher than the level of antibodies seen in recovered patients, the authors said. All patients in the study of B2 were white and non-Hispanic, with more older women than older men participating. The younger patients were a median of 37 years old, while the older ones were a median of 69. Pfizer has said that some data from its large study of the B2 vaccine could come as early as October.

Preprint of new report available at medRxiv:

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.08.17.20176651v1.full.pdf

The companies started a large study of a vaccine candidate for Covid-19 aimed at securing approvals — but it’s not the one for which results were released. Pfizer and BioNTech are starting a large study of a vaccine candidate for Covid-19 aimed at securing approvals — but it’s not the one for which results were released earlier this month. The companies always said that they planned to pick from among four different candidates, all of which use a technology called messenger RNA to produce a protein on SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes Covid-19. The vaccine is designed to lead the immune system to recognize the protein, and, it is hoped, to attack the virus. On July 1, the companies announced results in a preprint publication showing that one vaccine candidate, BNT162b1, prompted an immune response in patients. That vaccine encoded a key portion of the spike protein, which SARS-CoV-2 uses to enter cells. The vaccine being taken forward, BNT162b2, encodes an optimized version of the whole spike protein, which should lead to “more consistent responses across diverse populations and in older adults,” Pfizer said in a statement. Philip Dormitzer, a Pfizer vice president in charge of vaccines, said the selected vaccine appears to generate a stronger response, in part because it includes more of the spike protein. That could mean less variability in how people respond to the vaccine. It also seemed to cause fewer side effects. “It just seemed a bit milder,” Dormitzer said in an interview. “There were fewer reactions to immunization, and that was an important mark in its favor.”

The study, which began today, will recruit about 30,000 healthy volunteers between 18 and 85, randomizing half to get the vaccine and the rest to get placebo. Pfizer will recruit from about 120 sites in countries around the world, including the U.S., Germany, and Brazil. The primary goal is preventing patients from developing Covid-19, and the secondary endpoints include preventing severe cases of the disease and protecting volunteers against asymptomatic infections. The announcement came hours after Moderna began a 30,000-participant trial of its own. Like Pfizer and BioNTech, Moderna’s vaccine uses messenger RNA to compel the body to produce spike proteins, leading to an immune response that will ideally protect subjects from Covid-19. Pfizer and BioNTech said that they are on track to file for regulatory review as early as October, and that they plan to supply up to 100 million doses by the end of 2020 and 1.3 billion doses by the end of 2021.