Merck announced it is stopping development of both of the current formulations of the Covid-19 vaccines the company was working on. Merck said Monday it will stop developing both of the current formulations of the Covid-19 vaccines the company was working on, citing inadequate immune responses to the shots. Work will continue on at least one of the vaccines, which is being developed in partnership with the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI), to see if using a different route of administration would improve how effective it is. The announcement marks a shocking setback for one of the most storied vaccine makers, and will raise tensions around readouts expected soon from other companies, including Johnson & Johnson and the upstart NovaVax. Merck said it remains committed to research on Covid-19 and will focus on two treatments it is developing. One is an antiviral medicine against SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes the disease. The other is a medicine aimed at helping hospitalized patients by reducing the immune system’s over-response to the virus; it has already shown promise in clinical studies. “We’re disappointed by this result,” Nick Kartsonis, a senior vice president for infectious disease and vaccines at Merck Research Laboratories, said in an interview with STAT. “But it also allows us to continue to focus on our therapeutic candidates and move those forward. And, you know, we are open to continue the work to see if we can address the pandemic in any way we can add value.”
The results from a Phase 1 trial, described briefly in Merck’s press release, were resoundingly disappointing. The hope was that Merck’s vaccines, which were unique because they used viruses that could replicate once they were in the body, would be long-lasting, one-dose vaccines. The virus used for the vaccine being developed with IAVI is the one used in Merck’s successful vaccine against Ebola. The other vaccine used measles virus, a type of vaccine Merck has manufactured for decades. Both vaccines, however, produced lower levels of antibodies against SARS-CoV, including binding antibodies and neutralizing antibodies, than is seen in the blood of individuals who have recovered from Covid-19. Kartsonis said it was difficult to compare results from different studies because researchers have used different assays to measure antibody levels. But it appears neither vaccine performed as well as the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines, which resulted in antibody levels several times above those seen in people who have recovered from Covid-19, and the AstraZeneca/Oxford vaccine, which led to antibody levels roughly equivalent to those seen in people who have recovered from Covid-19. There are biologically plausible explanations for why the vaccine Merck was developing in partnership with IAVI underperformed in the Phase 1 trial, IAVI President Mark Feinberg told STAT. The vaccine was administered by intramuscular injection; an oral or intranasal administration route might work better, he said. “While these data are disappointing, this is not the end of the program for us,” Feinberg said.
Merck Press Release (Jan. 25, 2021):