Long-Term Follow-Up of Recovered Patients with COVID-19 | Virus World | Scoop.it
By early January, 2021, COVID-19, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), had resulted in more than 83 million confirmed cases and more than 1·8 million deaths. The clinical spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 infection is wide, encompassing asymptomatic infection, fever, fatigue, myalgias, mild upper respiratory tract illness, severe life-threatening viral pneumonia requiring admission to hospital, and death.  Physicians are observing persisting symptoms and unexpected, substantial organ dysfunction after SARS-CoV-2 infection in an increasing number of patients who have recovered, as previously observed in the SARS outbreak. However, COVID-19 is a new disease and uncertainty remains regarding the possible long-term health sequelae. This is particularly relevant for patients with severe symptoms, including those who required mechanical ventilation during their hospital stay, for whom long-term complications and incomplete recovery after discharge would be expected. Unfortunately, few reports exist on the clinical picture of the aftermath of COVID-19.
 
The study by Chaolin Huang and colleagues  in The Lancet is relevant and timely. They describe the clinical follow-up of a cohort of 1733 adult patients (48% women, 52% men; median age 57·0 years, IQR 47·0–65·0) with COVID-19 who were discharged from Jin Yin-tan Hospital (Wuhan, China). 6 months after illness onset, 76% (1265 of 1655) of the patients reported at least one symptom that persisted, with fatigue or muscle weakness being the most frequently reported symptom (63%, 1038 of 1655). More than 50% of patients presented with residual chest imaging abnormalities. Disease severity during the acute phase was independently associated with the extent of lung diffusion impairment at follow-up (odds ratio 4·60, 95% CI 1·85–11·48), with 56% (48 of 86) of patients requiring high-flow nasal cannula, non-invasive ventilation, and invasive mechanical ventilation during their hospital stay having impaired pulmonary diffusion capacity. These findings are consistent with those from earlier small studies that reported lingering radiological and pulmonary diffusion abnormalities in a sizeable proportion of COVID-19 patients up to 3 months after hospital discharge.
 
 
Evidence from previous coronavirus outbreaks suggests that some degree of lung damage could persist, as shown in patients who recovered from SARS, 38% of whom had reduced lung diffusion capacity 15 years after infection. Although SARS-CoV-2 primarily affects the lungs, several other organs, including the kidney, can also be affected. Therefore, Huang and colleagues assessed the sequelae of extrapulmonary manifestations of COVID-19. Unexpectedly, 13% (107 of 822) of the patients who did not develop acute kidney injury during their hospital stay and presented with normal renal function, based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) during the acute phase, exhibited a decline in eGFR (<90 mL/min per 1·73 m2) at follow-up.  However, this finding must be interpreted with caution...
 
Original findings published in the Lancet (Jan. 8, 2021):