CanSino and Moderna are the first vaccine makers to report data on safety and neutralization, but the extent of protection these products afford remains unclear. CanSino Biologics and a team of researchers from seven different Chinese institutions have published the results of a phase 1 trial of the company’s SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein vaccine. The intramuscularly injected adenoviral vaccine elicited both neutralizing antibodies and a T-cell response in a phase 1 study in 108 volunteers. A week earlier, Moderna raised a cool $1.34 billion in a share offering after it press-released preliminary data from just eight healthy volunteers from a phase 1 trial of its mRNA vaccine candidate against SARS-CoV-2. The limited data released suggest that their vaccine can stimulate the production of neutralizing antibodies and appears to be safe in a tiny group of individuals; it is not clear how these relate to antibody responses in the general population.
CanSino’s open-label dose-escalation study found that 75–83% of patients in three groups, each with a different dosage (5 × 1011, 1 × 1012 or 5 × 1012 viral particles), reported at least one adverse reaction by day 7, such as pain at the injection site and sometimes fever, fatigue, headache and muscle pain. The effects were most severe at the highest dose, and the vaccine’s developers plan to take the medium dose into a phase 2 trial. Tantalizingly, the preliminary data also indicate the adenoviral serotype 5 (Ad5) vaccine generates neutralizing antibody and T-cell responses, although whether the reported responses will prove to be protective is open to question. “We have no idea what titers are needed to protect,” says Hildegund Ertl, professor in the Wistar Institute’s Vaccine & Immunotherapy Center. The lack of a standardized virus neutralization assay for SARS-CoV-2 complicates data interpretation. “As long as people are using different assays, it’s going to be hard to figure that out.”
But just 50% of those who received the medium dose developed neutralizing antibodies, a rate that, Ertl says, “is not particularly good.” The T-cell response was “not particularly impressive” either...